Wilfrid Prest, ed.
If the Supreme Court mythologizes Blackstone, it is equally true that Blackstone himself was engaged in something of a mythmaking project. Far from a neutral reporter, Blackstone has some stories to tell, in particular the story of the hero law. The problems associated with using the Commentaries as a transparent window on eighteenth-century American legal norms, however, do not make Blackstone’s text irrelevant today. The chapter concludes with my brief reading of the Commentaries as a critical mirror of some twenty-first-century legal and social structures. That analysis draws on a long-term project, in which I am making my way through all four volumes of the Commentaries and posting short responsive essays online on the Blackstone Weekly.
Reading Blackstone in the Twenty-First Century and the Twenty-First Century through Blackstone,
Re-Interpreting Blackstone's Commentaries: A Seminal Text in National and International Contexts
Available at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_book-chapters/26
Common Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Judges Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal History Commons, Litigation Commons, Other Anthropology Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other Philosophy Commons, Philosophy of Mind Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons