Irene Calboli and Maria Lilla Montagnani
Oxford University Press
This chapter traces the emergence of Critical Race Intellectual Property (CRTIP) as a distinct area of study and activism that builds on the work of Critical Legal Studies and Critical Intellectual Property scholars. Invested in the workings of power - but with particular intersectional attentiveness to race - Critical Intellectual Property works to imagine new, often more socially just, forms of knowledge produce. In this brief chapter, we lay out the origins of Critical Race Theory (CRT) and its central methods, articulate a vision of CRT, and contemplate how CRT's interdisciplinary and transnational methods might apply to intellectual property. In accomplishing the latter, we use India's commitments to access to knowledge in the recent Delhi University copyshop case and controversy over Novartis's drug Gleevec to show how CRT's central insights can open possibilities for reading intellectual property law with attunement to structures of racial power.
Anjali Vats & Deidre A. Keller,
Critical Race Theory as Intellectual Property Methodology,
Intellectual Property Research
Available at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_book-chapters/38
Educational Technology Commons, Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, Other Communication Commons, Personality and Social Contexts Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, Sociology of Culture Commons, Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons