Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2011
Abstract
The Thirteenth Amendment was intended to eliminate the institution of slavery and to eliminate the legacy of slavery. Having accomplished the former, the Amendment has only rarely been extended to the latter. The Thirteenth Amendment’s great promise therefore remains unrealized.
This Article explores the gap between the Thirteenth Amendment’s promise and its implementation. Drawing on Critical Race Theory, this Article argues that the relative underdevelopment of Thirteenth Amendment doctrine is due in part to a lack of perceived interest convergence in eliminating what the Amendment’s Framers called the “badges and incidents of slavery.” The theory of interest convergence, in its strongest form, suggests that civil rights gains seldom happen unless they are perceived as advancing, or at least not hindering, the material interests of dominant groups.
Recommended Citation
William M. Carter Jr.,
The Thirteenth Amendment and Interest Convergence,
71
Maryland Law Review
21
(2011).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/382
Included in
Civil Procedure Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Education Law Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legislation Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons