Document Type
Amici Brief
Publication Date
2024
Abstract
This amicus brief, submitted to the Supreme Court in Moyle v. United States, argues that Moyle, and the impending circuit split surrounding it, is a symptom of a larger workability problem with the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization framework. Dobbs is already proving, in its brief existence, to be unworkable, and must be overturned. In short order, the Dobbs ruling has ushered in an era of unprecedented legal and doctrinal chaos, precipitating a fury of disorienting legal battles across the country. The Dobbs framework has created destabilizing conflicts between federal and state authorities, as in the current case, and between and among states. These conflicts are proliferating because of the Pandora’s box of constitutional questions Dobbs opened, implicating travel, federalism, extraterritorial jurisdiction, preemption, and federal executive power. Less than two years after it was decided, it is evident that Dobbs has proven unworkable and should be overruled.
Recommended Citation
David S. Cohen, Greer Donley & Rachel Rebouché,
Brief of Amici Curiae in Support of the United States: Moyle & Idaho v. United States,
Supreme Court of the United States, Nos. 23-726 & 23-727
(2024).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_amici_briefs/3
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Family Law Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Obstetrics and Gynecology Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons, Women's Health Commons