Formal groups play an important role in the law. Informal groups largely lie outside it. Should the law be more attentive to informal groups? The paper argues that this and related questions are appearing more frequently as a number of computer technologies, which I collect under the heading social software, increase the salience of groups. In turn, that salience raises important questions about both the significance and the benefits of informal groups. The paper suggests that there may be important social benefits associated with informal groups, and that the law should move towards a framework for encouraging and recognizing them. Such a framework may be organized along three dimensions by which groups arise and sustain themselves: regulating places, things, and stories.
Michael J. Madison,
Social Software, Groups, and Governance,
Michigan State Law Review
Available at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/352
Cognitive Neuroscience Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Society Commons, Place and Environment Commons, Political Economy Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, Rule of Law Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, Theory, Knowledge and Science Commons