This Essay was written as part of a Symposium on open access publishing for legal scholarship. It makes the claim that open access publishing models will succeed, or not, to the extent that they account for the existing economy of prestige that drives law reviews and legal scholarship. What may seem like a lot of uncharitable commentary is intended instead as an expression of guarded optimism: Imaginative reuse of some existing tools of scholarly publishing (even by some marginalized members of the prestige economy - or perhaps especially by them) may facilitate the emergence of a viable open access norm.
Michael J. Madison,
The Idea of the Law Review: Scholarship, Prestige, and Open Access,
Lewis & Clark Law Review
Available at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/353
Intellectual Property Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Society Commons, Political Economy Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, Rule of Law Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, Theory, Knowledge and Science Commons