This Article examines the indeterminacy of standing doctrine by deconstructing recent desegregation, affirmative action, and racial profiling cases. This examination is an attempt to uncover the often unstated meta-principles that guide standing jurisprudence. The Article contends that the inherent indeterminacy of standing law can be understood as reflecting an unstated desire to protect racial and class privilege, which is accomplished through the dogma of individualism, equal opportunity (liberty), and “white innocence.” Relying on insights from System Justification Theory, a burgeoning field of social psychology, the Article argues that the seemingly incoherent results in racial standing cases can be understood as unconscious attempts to preserve the status quo. The Article proposes moving “beyond the transcendental nonsense” of standing doctrine and its inevitable replication of economic and racial privilege by completely eliminating all standing limitations to the access of justice.
The First Principles of Standing: Privilege, System Justification, and the Predictable Incoherence of Article III,
Columbia Journal of Race & Law
Available at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/503
Civil Procedure Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Jurisdiction Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, Place and Environment Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, Religion Law Commons, Social Justice Commons