Race-neutrality has long been touted in American law as central to promoting racial equality while guarding against race-based discrimination. And yet the legal doctrine of race-neutrality has perversely operated to shield claims of racial discrimination from judicial review while protecting discriminators from liability and punishment. This Article critiques the doctrine of race-neutrality by examining the law’s response to white vigilantism in the much-publicized criminal trials of Kyle Rittenhouse and that of Ahmaud Arbery’s assailants.
White Vigilantism and the Racism of Race-Neutrality,
Denver Law Review
Available at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/558
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legislation Commons, Political Economy Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons