In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, states have ordered the cessation of non-essential healthcare. Unfortunately, many conservative states have sought to capitalize on those orders to halt abortion care. In this short paper, we argue that abortion should not fall under any state’s non-essential healthcare order. Major medical organizations recognize that abortion is essential healthcare that must be provided even in a pandemic, and the law recognizes abortion as a time-sensitive constitutional right. Finally, we examine the constitutional arguments as to why enforcing these orders against abortion providers should not stand constitutional scrutiny. We conclude that no public health purpose can be served by this application because abortion uses less scarce resources and involves fewer contacts with healthcare professionals than prenatal care and delivery assistance, which is continuing to be provided in this public health emergency.
Greer Donley, Beatrice Chen & Sonya Borrero,
The Legal and Medical Necessity of Abortion Care Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic,
Journal of Law and Biosciences
Available at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/86
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Epidemiology Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Infectious Disease Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Obstetrics and Gynecology Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons, Women's Health Commons