Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2006
Abstract
Tracing is a method that appears within multiple fields of law. Distinct conceptions of tracing, however, have arisen independently within securities and remedial law. In the securities context plaintiffs must trace their securities to a specific offering to pursue certain relief under the Securities Act of 1933. In the remedial context victims who trace their misappropriated value into a wrongdoer's hands can claim any derivative value, even if it has appreciated.
This article is the first to compare and then cross-apply tracing within these two contexts. Specifically, this article argues that securities law should adopt a version of the rules-based tracing method from remedial law. This method's tracing of exchanged value, instead of purchased securities, will restore broad access to private civil remedies and the optimal level of deterrence for fraudulent public offerings.
Recommended Citation
Peter B. Oh,
Tracing,
80
Tulane Law Review
849
(2006).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/133
Included in
Banking and Finance Law Commons, Business Intelligence Commons, Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Corporate Finance Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Finance and Financial Management Commons, Law and Economics Commons, National Security Law Commons, Securities Law Commons, Technology and Innovation Commons