Troxel and the Rhetoric of Associational Respect

Authors

David J. Herring, University of Pittsburgh School of LawFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2001

Abstract

A recent decision by the United States Supreme Court has brought into sharp focus important questions about the nature and extent of parents' prerogatives to dictate how their children are raised. In the case of Troxel v. Granville, the Court addressed a Washington third-party visitation statute that permitted "any person" to petition for visitation with a child. Under the statute, a petitioner had to allege that visitation would serve the child's best interest. A judge hearing such a petition could order visitation whenever he or she found that such visitation may serve the child's best interest.

The United States Supreme Court's consideration of the Washington statute resulted in a splintered array of opinions that call for a serious and full public discussion of third-party visitation statutes. Justice Scalia's opinion opens the door to such a discussion by moving the issues away from constitutional rights rhetoric that only leads to confusion and stalemate in discussions of family policies and issues. He wisely calls for the public discussion and debate to begin. The participants in this public discussion would be well served by a deep and probing consideration of the family's political functions within a large pluralistic democracy.

Recommended Citation

David J. Herring, Troxel and the Rhetoric of Associational Respect, 62 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 649 (2001).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/282