Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2005
Abstract
Many of the new democracies established in the last twenty years are severely ethnically divided, with numerous minority groups, languages, and religions. As part of the process of democratization, there has also been an explosion of “national human rights institutions,” that is, independent government agencies whose purpose is to promote enforcement of human rights. But despite the significance of minority concerns to the stability and success of these new democracies, and despite the relevance of minority rights to the mandates of national human rights institutions, a surprisingly limited number of national human rights institutions have directed programs and resources to addressing minority issues. This article explores the activities of national human rights institutions, identifying regional and content trends in these programs, identifying factors correlating to the existence of such programs, and considering the implications of these patterns for the established legal frameworks for minority and indigenous rights. Finally, this article suggests some productive roles that national human rights institutions might play in protecting the interests of minority groups.
Recommended Citation
Elena Baylis,
Minority Rights, Minority Wrongs,
10
UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs
66
(2005).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/345
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, Social Justice Commons