Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2022
Abstract
Although the United States tends to treat crimes against humanity as a danger that exists only in authoritarian or war-torn states, in fact, there is a real risk of crimes against humanity occurring within the United States, as illustrated by events such as systemic police brutality against Black Americans, the federal government’s family separation policy that took thousands of immigrant children from their parents at the southern border, and the dramatic escalation of White supremacist and extremist violence culminating in the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. In spite of this risk, the United States does not have a federal law prohibiting crimes against humanity. This Article first applies international law to define crimes against humanity and assess the risk of crimes against humanity occurring within the United States. It then turns to domestic law to evaluate the potential for a federal law or other federal measures to protect against crimes against humanity, including the political obstacles, the likelihood that any future legislation will depart significantly from international law, and the implications for effectiveness.
Recommended Citation
Elena Baylis,
White Supremacy, Police Brutality, and Family Separation: Preventing Crimes Against Humanity Within the United States,
University of Illinois Law Review, Forthcoming
(2022).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/438
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, American Politics Commons, Civil Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Immigration Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Legislation Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, Public Policy Commons, Rule of Law Commons, Social Justice Commons