Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2019
Abstract
Despite being in effect for over thirty years, a debate continues on whether the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) has been a success. With 89 Contracting States, it clearly is widely accepted. At the same time, empirical studies show that private parties regularly opt out of its application. It has served as a model for domestic sales law, and as an important educational tool. But has it been a success? In this article I consider that question, and suggests that the scorecard is not yet complete; and that it will perhaps take significantly more time to gauge success or failure. While those who say the CISG has not been a success point to private party failure to choose it as the applicable law, I suggest that the future determination of success of the CISG is likely to be determined as much by choice of forum. Three forums in particular provide significant opportunity for success: large-scale contracts between multinational companies who prefer international commercial arbitration; middle-class contracts that will benefit from the 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements; and small and medium-sized contracts that may benefit most from the development of online dispute resolution (ODR). I consider each of these forums and how the CISG may play a more important role in the future of international sales law.
Recommended Citation
Ronald A. Brand,
The CISG: Applicable Law and Applicable Forums,
38
Journal of Law and Commerce
137
(2019).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/455
Included in
Banking and Finance Law Commons, Commercial Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Conflict of Laws Commons, Contracts Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, European Law Commons, International Economics Commons, International Law Commons, International Relations Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Jurisdiction Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal Profession Commons, Litigation Commons, Political Economy Commons, Rule of Law Commons, Transnational Law Commons